Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username


Password





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 31,028
» Latest member: Rogernash
» Forum threads: 1,879
» Forum posts: 19,906

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 147 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 143 Guest(s)
Bing, Facebook, Google, Twitter

Latest Threads
Man Utd Fixtures and Resu...
Forum: Man Utd Live Stream
Last Post: ManUtdPeople
14-09-2025, 02:34 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 3,131
Man City vs Man Utd Live ...
Forum: Man Utd Live Stream
Last Post: ManUtdPeople
14-09-2025, 02:27 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1,481
Manchester United Transfe...
Forum: Transfer Talk
Last Post: Noucamp99
08-09-2025, 11:32 AM
» Replies: 219
» Views: 174,439
Gold subscription
Forum: Newbies
Last Post: jakkin
30-08-2025, 01:38 PM
» Replies: 31
» Views: 23,419
Man Utd vs Burnley Live S...
Forum: Man Utd Live Stream
Last Post: ManUtdPeople
30-08-2025, 12:59 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 4,106

 
  Favourite United Chants?
Posted by: WatchMUFC - 12-01-2010, 05:20 PM - Forum: Man Utd Chants - Replies (12)

This place is a bit dull and empty lately lets get a thread goin...

Whats Your Favourite United Chants?

Print this item

  Transfers
Posted by: sypher - 12-01-2010, 04:11 PM - Forum: Transfer Talk - Replies (9)

Seen this on BBC Sport's website.

MANCHESTER UNITED

Money to spend: In theory, manager Sir Alex Ferguson still has the £80m the club earned from the sale of winger Cristiano Ronaldo to Real Madrid. However, rumours always surround the financial stability of the debt-ridden club under the ownership of Malcolm Glazer.
January previous: Last season Ferguson signed Serbian winger Zoran Tosic and agreed a deal in principle for his former team-mate Adem Ljajic for £16m. United later withdrew their interest in Ljajic and Ferguson is notoriously frugal in January.
What they need: With doubts surrounding the long-term fitness of defender Rio Ferdinand and midfielder Owen Hargreaves, Ferguson may have to strengthen in these areas. Neither Ben Foster or Tomasz Kuszczak have proved they are suitable replacements for keeper Edwin van der Sar. Striker Dimitar Berbatov is yet to win over the Old Trafford faithful and winger Nani has not lived up to expectation.

Who they might buy: Bolton defender Gary Cahill, Everton's Jack Rodwell, Porto's Bruno Alves and Palermo's Simon Kjaer have all been linked to United. Lyon keeper Hugo Lloris and CSKA Moscow stopper Igor Akinfeev are also attracting interest. Benfica winger Angel di Maria is another player who could be heading to Old Trafford while many United fans would relish the arrival or Valencia forward David Villa.
Who might be leaving: Keeper Ben Foster may head out on loan to improve his prospects of inclusion in England's World Cup squad while Nani could be used as bait to lure Di Maria from Benfica. Striker Federico Macheda could also head out on loan while winger Tosic is expected to be shown the exit door after failing to impress in the reserves.
What the fans say: "We need to focus on getting a midfielder with flair and who has that creative edge we are lacking."

source:BBC Sport

What do you think about it? I don't think it's real at all....

Print this item

  Virtual DJ
Posted by: DaleDaManc - 12-01-2010, 02:16 PM - Forum: Chat Room - Replies (9)

I'v started to DJ on justin tv recently but iv download VDJ on a 20 trail but its worth 299.00 :O any one try get me it free on torrent please

Print this item

  ManUtd Will Not Be Buying Anyone
Posted by: DaleDaManc - 12-01-2010, 01:14 PM - Forum: Transfer Talk - Replies (21)

If you read what noucamp99 sed on the Glazers you might know that now United will not be buying anyone this year witch means We need to Win the Carling Cup Sad
These banks are looking for there money back witch could turn messy but dont worry we will be back!!!!!
so dont read and of the rumours you see about us spending cash because there not true end of story!SadSad

Print this item

  Glazers Rip Off United?
Posted by: Noucamp99 - 12-01-2010, 11:02 AM - Forum: Man Utd News - Replies (11)

According to further press releases from Red Football, that allow a little more insight into the accounts, the Glazer family 'borrowed' in excess of £10million from the debt-ridden company!

Lurking in the full, heart-sinking detail of the Glazer family's proposal to borrow £500m, a partial replacement for the £700m debts their takeover has loaded on to Manchester United, is a page documenting the millions United have paid out to the family members themselves. None of the Glazers appear to have taken a salary out of the club since that May 2005 takeover, which United fans bitterly opposed and which has since cost the club more than £325m in interest.

In those three and half years, ticket prices have almost doubled at Old Trafford, where previously they were restrained to cater for the regulars at the Lou Macari Fish Bar, as well as the prawn sandwich consumers.

The MU Finance plc prospectus, launched in the City yesterday, sets out the fortune the Glazer family have reaped from the club they borrowed £540m to buy. From 1 July 2006, in five separate payments, a round total of £10m was paid in "management and administration fees" to companies affiliated to the Glazers. Under the new bond issue, the family is entitled to be paid up to £6m by United in management and administration fees.

On 30 June last year, United entered into a consultancy agreement with SLP Partners, "a company related to certain of our ultimate shareholders", to pay up to £2.9m. On top of that, on 19 December 2008, each of Malcolm Glazer's five sons and one daughter, all of whom are directors of Red Football Limited, each personally borrowed about £1.66m from the club, a total of £10m.

Added together, the management fees, consultancy agreement maximum and the £10m the six family members actually borrowed from United make a total of £22.9m paid to the family and their affiliated companies in three and a half years.

No explanation was offered yesterday for these fees, or for why the Glazer family felt the need to borrow £10m from Manchester United. The Glazer family's official spokesman, who is responsible for discussing United's financial affairs, declined to comment.

Duncan Drasdo, chairman of the Manchester United Supporters Trust, was more forthright. "Now we know that as well as their takeover imposing a huge debt on the club, and the massive interest payments United have to service each year out of the club's ticket and other income, the Glazer family have paid themselves many millions of pounds personally," he said. "The tide is turning at Old Trafford as fans see how much the takeover has cost, the increased ticket prices and the failure to invest in the team despite £81m received from selling Cristiano Ronaldo. We do not want the Glazers to refinance the massive debts they have brought to the club — we want them to go."

The accounts released yesterday were for just one company, Red Football Limited, in the thicket the Glazers have built around the Old Trafford crock of gold. The figures showed the net interest for the year to 30 June 2009, on the £514.5m debts loaded on to that company, was £42m. That, then, soaked up more than half the galactic fee Real Madrid are scheduled to pay for Ronaldo. Another United company records the £175m also owed to hedge funds, at 14.25% interest — a charge in 2008-09 of £25m.

Sir Alex Ferguson said last week that the Ronaldo money is available to him, and he had "absolutely no issue at all with the club's finances". Yet the £81m took United from a thumping, multimillion-pound loss it would have recorded, into the £26m profit being highlighted to the City yesterday.

It is, quite simply, impossible to sustain the argument, to intelligent supporters stumping up their hard-earned cash for tickets at ever-increasing prices, that the £700m borrowings the Glazers have imposed, and £67m of interest payable last year, is having no impact.

City sources were saying yesterday that United's sheer size, income and dedicated following makes the bond issue an attractive enough offer – despite the "high degree of risk", including a possible fall in success, decline in crowds and uncertainty over who will replace Ferguson.

The fees to be earned by the bankers and professionals who have made this all possible is £15m. By the end of it, the Glazer family may be able to replace £500m they have borrowed with a different £500m borrowed on slightly less terror-inducing terms. But Manchester United, formerly the proud, rich, football behemoth of the Premier League, will still be laden with the extraordinary debts of a takeover which nobody wanted, except for seven members of a family in Florida, and their very well-paid advisers.


Source: guardian.co.uk

I repeat my statement from the earlier thread (https://manutdpeople.com/Thread-Glazers-...Bond-Issue) Glazers must go NOW!

Print this item